Oct 24

Why not F# (FSHarp)? I’d like to see F# made a product!

F# (FSharp) is not a good idea! It is a good idea with a good implementation! And that’s the point! It has integration with Visual Studio and some good tools with it! It proves it’s ability to seamlessly integrate with .NET technologies; like upcoming linq thing. A multi-paradigm space that is beautiful, useful and comfortable. There is nothing about it too scary to be abandoned! It is very accessible : in usage and in it’s concepts. F# is useful! That’s my great discovery! It can be used to do the things that need to be done. Why microsoft is going a wrong way about F#? The next big language that will bust software developing is F#. Not C# 3.0! Is there anyone there that learns a bit from Ruby on Rails? Just announce F# an official supported product. Microsoft can do that. Microsoft announced many useless and badly developed products officially! Why not to put some good one on the rail?
I want to see F# in visual studio. I will pay for it. And I want Microsoft grants me for supporting it.

Jun 26

F# available (currently MSI only): Includes overloaded numeric conversion functions and checked arithmetic

Hi all,

I’m glad to announce the availability of F# It’s available for download from this link:


This is in general a bug fix release over, with some exceptions

  • We’ve added

Jun 26

F# 1.1.13 now available!

I?m pleased to announce that F# 1.1.13 is now available! You can download this release from http://research.microsoft.com/fsharp/release.aspx .